NSF's mission is particularly well-implemented through the integration of research and education and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.
These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. Proposers should be aware of core strategies that are essential to the fulfillment of NSF's mission, as articulated in Building the Future: Investing in Discovery and Innovation - NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2018 – 2022. This Guide also serves as a means of highlighting the accountability requirements associated with Federal awards. The information contained in this Guide will assist the organization in preparing documents which NSF requires to conduct administrative and financial reviews of the organization. The requisite information is described in the NSF Prospective New Awardee Guide. Grant Administration Disputes and MisconductĬhapter II - Proposal Preparation InstructionsĮach proposing organization that is new to NSF or has not had an active NSF assistance award within the previous five years should be prepared to submit basic organization and management information and certifications, when requested, to the applicable award-making division within the Office of Budget, Finance & Award Management (BFA). Other Post Award Requirements and Considerations Part II: Award, Administration and Monitoring of Grants and Cooperative Agreements His one great achievement is being the father of three amazing children.Part I: Proposal Preparation and Submission Guidelines He is one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) and is co-creator of , the RAGE podcast, the Resuscitology course, and the SMACC conference. He created the ‘Critically Ill Airway’ course and teaches on numerous courses around the world. He coordinates the Alfred ICU’s education and simulation programmes and runs the unit’s education website, INTENSIVE. He is actively involved in in using translational simulation to improve patient care and the design of processes and systems at Alfred Health.
Fastlane equipment professional#
He has completed fellowship training in both intensive care medicine and emergency medicine, as well as post-graduate training in biochemistry, clinical toxicology, clinical epidemiology, and health professional education. He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives.Īfter finishing his medical degree at the University of Auckland, he continued post-graduate training in New Zealand as well as Australia’s Northern Territory, Perth and Melbourne. He is on the Board of Directors for the Intensive Care Foundation and is a First Part Examiner for the College of Intensive Care Medicine. He is also a Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University. He is a co-founder of the Australia and New Zealand Clinician Educator Network (ANZCEN) and is the Lead for the ANZCEN Clinician Educator Incubator programme. > positive fluid balance significant predictor of hospital mortality (independent of type of monitoring used)Ĭhris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at the Alfred ICU in Melbourne. > PiCCO associated with greater positive fluid balance and fewer ventilator-free days PiCCO vs PAC – Uchino and Bellomo – Critical Care 2006, 10: R174 > EVLW associated with audible crepitations
Global end-diastolic index (GEDI) – 680-800mL/m2.SV – preload, afterload and contractility Summary of useful values and normal ranges
0 kommentar(er)
